Nature vs. Nurture Essay

Introductory Section

This part highlights various definitions of nurture and nature besides giving scenarios plus thesis statement expounding nature vs nurture debate alongside how to start nature vs nurture essay.


Psychologists agree that debates surrounding nature vs nurture are the oldest discussion that have elicited various discussions besides reasons that try to justify varying standpoints.


  • From psychologists and philosophers perspectives, how is nature and nurture explained and what is nature versus nurture?

  • What are the difference between nature and nurture and their meaning from both psychologist plus philosopher's perspective

  • Nature vs nurture debate: Why the hullabaloos anyway and why do some people think either side is superior?

  • Is a behavioral outcome dependent on gene structure or on the environment?

  • Hereditation versus past experiences as well as nature vs nurture examples

Summary of the Main Article

Nature vs nurture contention has been settled and there is indeed equal contribution that both make in growth and development of man. The structure has provided how to start a nature vs nurture essay that is helpful. It can also include aspects such as nurture definition in brief.

Article Example on Nature vs. Nurture

Psychologists contend with the fact that nature vs nurture debate is the oldest discussion that has elicited various discussions besides reasons that try to justify certain angles or persuasion elevating either side of the argument. The ever resurgent question is, however, what really is nurture and what is nature? Why do they attract a lot of debate in the first place? To begin with, nature is defined as a wholesome genetic makeup of a person including the influences emanating from hereditation which eventually makes people who they are physically and with regards to their persona. On the other hand, nurture is defined as a composition of all the variables within an environment impacting what man can be defined to be. These factors include experiences people go through during their nascent ages, their upbringing in addition to the cultural affiliations as well as their relationship with others including friends, close relatives and other social gatherings.

The approach to understanding the outstanding issue that is nature vs nurture has always been one put against the other with fewer regards to the substance of either. This has effectively contributed to a prolonged debate of nature vs nurture that has left scholars with making a decision on which side outweighs the other in terms of their influence. While this shouldn't be the case, biologists have fervently pushed their idea that nature is what influences a person's behavior other than influencing their overall development. In fact, the insistence has been that genetic composition within a man as well as the biological factors is what defines nature and. Even this school of thought maintains the substance of nature; whereas their counterpart maintains a contrary opinion that the setting has influence over what one becomes in addition to the behavior thus the difference between nature and nurture.

However, the argument putting nature vs nurture has since taken a new twist abandoning the narrow-angle that stressed that one angle was superior of over the other. Whether nature in the context of its proponents is the sole influencer of whom we become or nurture significantly outweighs nature in its influencing role is an argument that is neither there nor here. The recognition has been accorded to the fact that both nature and nurture are critically paramount as they play an equal role in determining what we become and our character as people. In other words, nature and nurture are interlocked.

To better understand the debate about nature vs nurture, the question that has to be answered is that is behavioral outcomes dependent on both genetic composition and factors of the environment? Or what actually is the difference between nature and nurture? Additionally, does our personality as human beings depend on hereditation and past experiences? The key aspect of this debate has always been the question challenging the contribution of hereditary traits Vis a Vis the environmental factors and their impact on the development of man in addition to addressing nurture definition. According to Plato, certain things are inborn and their occurrences are deemed to be natural far from the influence of the environment. Accordingly, the nativists are advancing the argument that inheritance is the cause of character formation as well as behavior. They define nurture as distant from nature.

According to other schools of thoughts, the characteristics, as well as man's behavior, emanate from a process of evolution whereby the genes and their characteristics are transferred right from the lineage to the child. These traits are carried further to the point of adulthood and they are what defined our uniqueness.

World-renowned philosophers and thinkers who include John Locke are among the believers of a concept known as a tabula rasa. This concept states that the process of acquiring any traits begins from a mind which is actually empty at the point of birth. Experience, therefore, plays an important role in enabling us to learn new things and nurture new behavior.

Then, there is a concept based on behavioral science which heavily hinges on Empiricism a concept taking a stand that learning is the mother of our behavior, as well as our character, further explores nature versus nurture. Conditioning according to the behaviorists informs all our behaviors as well as our actions. This implies that people's ability to become what they become later in life is a result of how they are conditioned but not on the basis of their hereditary affiliation.

Nature vs nurture examples include among others academic excellence or achievement. The question that is often asked is whether an outstanding success in academics is as a result of a predisposition to a good environment with best learning materials including access to learning aids or whether such success is resulting from one genealogy. Abusers and violent people also contribute to the question of whether such behaviors are inherited or just actions acquired out of experience and interaction with the environment within which people are brought up. Many people try to establish the difference between nature and nurture based on the above example.

Notably, some factors and visible traits transcend urgings of nature vs nurture given that they are indeed results of biological factors. Height and weight, the color of the hair, the color of the eye as well as diabetes are inherited, and for that reason, they cement the logical role of genetic in that particular angle. But, some of the biological traits can define nurture given that they are influenced by the environment; for example lifespan can be reduced by an accident.

Theories have also been mooted to advance the idea that biological factors are responsible for some actions, e.g. the acquisition of speech in children or how they learn to speak. Some theories explain that children are instinctively capable of learning and producing language given their mental ability.

Furthermore, the environment is linked to certain characters. It is impossible to rule out the role of parents in bringing us up thus influencing our behavior. There is a very big connection between word and what they really mean. The implication of words is attributable to the environment within which we are brought up and the observable things that we daily interact with.

Research has shown that nature must meet with nurture at every step of human life and that is why one cannot function in isolation. By the virtue that they must interact, human progression can be termed as complete.

Environmental factors such as affection, food, might influence nature in the sense that their absence may imply that one born in a family of tall people and possessing the genes to that effect may not grow to be tall because they lack proper nutrients. A person lacking affection may become introvert and shy away from other people. This basically shows that there is a very big reliance on the two factors for human beings to develop to the expectation of the world.

Historically, astuteness has been thought to be generated by genetics rather than exposure to an appropriate environment. This has drawn a lot of controversy as different schools of thought pulled in different directions. This confirms arguments aimed at exploring the subject 'what is nature vs nurture'. In fact, at some point, people were encouraged to get their partners from families who have exhibited high intellectual standards. Far from the previous notion held, the newly propagated belief is that nature versus nurture is no longer a debate of which one is better but that they both have an influence on a person's life and for that reason, they contribute to intelligence.


While trying to grasp how to start a nature vs nurture essay, understanding of 'what is nature vs nurture' provides the foundation. It is nearly impossible to dichotomize the nurture from nature and the vice versa given their joint contribution, and for that reason, even the ancient belief that one was superior by the other is no longer making sense. There is indeed no much difference between nature and nurture.