Nature vs. Nurture Introductory Section
Nature versus nature essay is structured just like other essays. It has an introduction, body and a conclusion. This part highlights various definitions of nurture and nature besides giving scenarios plus thesis statement expounding nature vs nurture debate alongside how to start nature vs nurture essay.
Psychologists agree that debates surrounding nature vs nurture are the oldest discussion that have elicited various discussions besides reasons that try to justify varying standpoints.
So what is nature vs nurture? Nature vs nurture is an intertwined situation whereby one influences the other; therefore neither can stand alone. In as much as there are so many factors that influences one’s behavior, one agreeable position among most debaters is that nurture and nature are of great importance in the growth of humans.
The debate pitying nurture against nature exists for a very long time spanning years and years;
- Amongst prominent philosophers who pioneered the debate whose arguments was that human beings or some of the things they do are naturally inborn included Socrates and Plato.
- Nativism, on the other hand, attributed human behavior to the environmental factor and stated that children are born with a clean slate and what they do in the course of their development is acquired influence of the environment.
Accordingly, the deliberation of nurture against nature centers on nature’s responsibility to fit behavior and how one develops is not restricted but are always determinants coming from the choices they make.
- There is always a connection between nurture and nature in the course of human life.
- The genetic factors acquired from the family tree plus the environmental inputs are responsible for the actions in addition to the process of development.
A concept explaining maturation serves as an idea about how children develop right from childhood.
- There are spontaneous events that accompany the growth of a child including speech acquisition.
- The child’s genetic composition greatly contributes to his or her ability to learn and utter speech in a language.
In every aspect of human life as well as our interaction with nature, nurture and nature are intertwined and therefore, cannot be separated.
- Genes and environment are intertwined
- Children who put in areas whereby they cannot interact with human develop a way of communicating and far more, they may developmental complications due to lack of care from the parents.
Other than the obvious influences that are affected by our genetic composition such as the color of our eyes, hair, and diseases like diabetes, a person’s lifestyle which is largely environmental can influence his or her lifespan
Our immune system can be compromised if we opt for food or a lifestyle that is devastating our health for example consumption of oily foodstuff which is full of cholesterol can clog our arteries hence contribute to heart diseases.
- From psychologists and philosophers perspectives, how is nature and nurture explained and what is nature versus nurture?
- What are the difference between nature and nurture and their meaning from both psychologist plus philosopher's perspective
- Nature vs nurture debate: Why the hullabaloos anyway and why do some people think either side is superior?
- Is a behavioral outcome dependent on gene structure or on the environment?
- Hereditation versus past experiences as well as nature vs nurture examples
Summary of the Main Article
Nature vs nurture contention has been settled and there is indeed equal contribution that both make in growth and development of man. The structure has provided how to start a nature vs nurture essay that is helpful. It can also include aspects such as nurture definition in brief. However, there is generally a consensus to the effect that nature vs nurture is just a debate but they cannot be isolated as both complements each other. With that, here is an example nature versus nurture essay.
Article Example on Nature vs. Nurture
Psychologists contend with the fact that nature vs nurture debate is the oldest discussion that has elicited various discussions besides reasons that try to justify certain angles or persuasion elevating either side of the argument. The ever resurgent question is, however, what really is nurture and what is nature? Why do they attract a lot of debate in the first place? To begin with, nature is defined as a wholesome genetic makeup of a person including the influences emanating from hereditation which eventually makes people who they are physically and with regards to their persona. On the other hand, nurture is defined as a composition of all the variables within an environment impacting what man can be defined to be. These factors include experiences people go through during their nascent ages, their upbringing in addition to the cultural affiliations as well as their relationship with others including friends, close relatives and other social gatherings.
The approach to understanding the outstanding issue that is nature vs nurture has always been one put against the other with fewer regards to the substance of either. This has effectively contributed to a prolonged debate of nature vs nurture that has left scholars with making a decision on which side outweighs the other in terms of their influence. While this shouldn't be the case, biologists have fervently pushed their idea that nature is what influences a person's behavior other than influencing their overall development. In fact, the insistence has been that genetic composition within a man as well as the biological factors is what defines nature and. Even this school of thought maintains the substance of nature; whereas their counterpart maintains a contrary opinion that the setting has influence over what one becomes in addition to the behavior thus the difference between nature and nurture.
However, the argument putting nature vs nurture has since taken a new twist abandoning the narrow-angle that stressed that one angle was superior of over the other. Whether nature in the context of its proponents is the sole influencer of whom we become or nurture significantly outweighs nature in its influencing role is an argument that is neither there nor here. The recognition has been accorded to the fact that both nature and nurture are critically paramount as they play an equal role in determining what we become and our character as people. In other words, nature and nurture are interlocked.
To better understand the debate about nature vs nurture, the question that has to be answered is that is behavioral outcomes dependent on both genetic composition and factors of the environment? Or what actually is the difference between nature and nurture? Additionally, does our personality as human beings depend on hereditation and past experiences? The key aspect of this debate has always been the question challenging the contribution of hereditary traits Vis a Vis the environmental factors and their impact on the development of man in addition to addressing nurture definition. According to Plato, certain things are inborn and their occurrences are deemed to be natural far from the influence of the environment. Accordingly, the nativists are advancing the argument that inheritance is the cause of character formation as well as behavior. They define nurture as distant from nature.
According to other schools of thoughts, the characteristics, as well as man's behavior, emanate from a process of evolution whereby the genes and their characteristics are transferred right from the lineage to the child. These traits are carried further to the point of adulthood and they are what defined our uniqueness.
World-renowned philosophers and thinkers who include John Locke are among the believers of a concept known as a tabula rasa. This concept states that the process of acquiring any traits begins from a mind which is actually empty at the point of birth. Experience, therefore, plays an important role in enabling us to learn new things and nurture new behavior.
Then, there is a concept based on behavioral science which heavily hinges on Empiricism a concept taking a stand that learning is the mother of our behavior, as well as our character, further explores nature versus nurture. Conditioning according to the behaviorists informs all our behaviors as well as our actions. This implies that people's ability to become what they become later in life is a result of how they are conditioned but not on the basis of their hereditary affiliation.
Nature vs nurture examples include among others academic excellence or achievement. The question that is often asked is whether an outstanding success in academics is as a result of a predisposition to a good environment with best learning materials including access to learning aids or whether such success is resulting from one genealogy. Abusers and violent people also contribute to the question of whether such behaviors are inherited or just actions acquired out of experience and interaction with the environment within which people are brought up. Many people try to establish the difference between nature and nurture based on the above example.
Notably, some factors and visible traits transcend urgings of nature vs nurture given that they are indeed results of biological factors. Height and weight, the color of the hair, the color of the eye as well as diabetes are inherited, and for that reason, they cement the logical role of genetic in that particular angle. But, some of the biological traits can define nurture given that they are influenced by the environment; for example lifespan can be reduced by an accident.
Theories have also been mooted to advance the idea that biological factors are responsible for some actions, e.g. the acquisition of speech in children or how they learn to speak. Some theories explain that children are instinctively capable of learning and producing language given their mental ability.
Furthermore, the environment is linked to certain characters. It is impossible to rule out the role of parents in bringing us up thus influencing our behavior. There is a very big connection between word and what they really mean. The implication of words is attributable to the environment within which we are brought up and the observable things that we daily interact with.
Research has shown that nature must meet with nurture at every step of human life and that is why one cannot function in isolation. By the virtue that they must interact, human progression can be termed as complete.
Environmental factors such as affection, food, might influence nature in the sense that their absence may imply that one born in a family of tall people and possessing the genes to that effect may not grow to be tall because they lack proper nutrients. A person lacking affection may become introvert and shy away from other people. This basically shows that there is a very big reliance on the two factors for human beings to develop to the expectation of the world.
Historically, astuteness has been thought to be generated by genetics rather than exposure to an appropriate environment. This has drawn a lot of controversy as different schools of thought pulled in different directions. This confirms arguments aimed at exploring the subject 'what is nature vs nurture'. In fact, at some point, people were encouraged to get their partners from families who have exhibited high intellectual standards. Far from the previous notion held, the newly propagated belief is that nature versus nurture is no longer a debate of which one is better but that they both have an influence on a person's life and for that reason, they contribute to intelligence.
Nature versus Nurture Essay Example #2
What is nature vs nurture? The Nature vs nurture debate has been here for a long time with various scholars, psychologists, and philosophers giving their point of view on what nature and nurture is. Essentially, this debate has always been centered on behavioral advancement. What therefore is nature vs nurture?
According to pro-nature debate, what human beings develop to be, where they are coming from and the genetic make-up, as well as inheritable traits such as our body structure from the parents, are what defines the human being’s nature. These components in their opinion are what shape the behavior of man. The proponents of nurture, on the other hand, contest the argument of the pro-nature by arguing that nurture is responsible for influencing the character, the physical appearance of man as well as the actions. Nurture is defined as the upbringing of a person that is largely influenced by the environmental factors such as the family, what we went through as children, the friends we had as children and our way of life or the cultural factors. Despite the two standpoints, the relationship between the two variables is such that they depend on each other and one cannot stand on its own given the important part they play in our life.
The genesis of nature vs. nurture dates back to the times of greatest philosophers like Socrates and Plato and Socrates. These philosophers in their contribution to the puzzling debate of nurture versus nature said that there is natural occurrence occasioned by the virtue of inborn characteristics. These things are not happening due to the factors of the environment far from the nativism proponents whose arguments were that genealogy was the key influence of all behaviors exhibited by man. Furthermore, the nativist said that children are born with a clean slate as their brain is completely unoccupied by anything but they learn and make their brains functional when they grow and develop.
As human beings progress from childhood into adulthood, several changes occur. These changes are both influenced by nature and nurture. There is no single point that one can rule out the input of nature in their lives. In other words, there is no major difference between nature and nurture. Biologically, human beings inherit genes from their parents. The family tree is carried onto the subsequent generations. This has been scientifically proven to be the reason why some people suffer from certain ailments and some do not, why others are tall while others are shot in terms of size. Despite nature’s contribution to such instances, nurture is equally important in changing human beings lives. The environment influences to a greater degree our worldview and our behaviors because there is always an interaction between the biological factors that make us and the environmental factors that we interact with.
Theorists in their attempt to explain nature vs nurture examples use the maturation concept that focuses on a child and the development stages of childhood. They argue that determined genetic events that are successively unfolding spontaneously are the basis of development. In essence, the theory expresses that there is a process that is biological which occurs over a duration based on stages that are predictable. The speech is acquired by a child based on their genetic make-up according to this theory. The stage involved in the acquisition of speech is the development of interest in signs and sounds at first by a child from their mother and father before they begin to utter words. On the contrary, it is not possible for the genes to fully carry out their functionalities without the important input of the environment.
If, for instance, a child because of the genes inherited from the parents is born deaf, acquiring the ability to speak becomes impossible. Sign language which can be learned from the environment, within which the child is, becomes the only alternative way of communicating with the world. What this implies is that there is interconnectedness between the two factors that is biological composition and the environment. Some studies went further to suggest or rather proving that children kept far away from human interaction or who are kept in isolation will still develop their own way of communicating. This proves the input of the surrounding environment in influencing certain things in human life. However, these children may develop mental challenges as well as physical challenges because they lack parental love, care and the ability to pick the human languages. This underlines the fact that there is indeed a relationship between the environment and genetic factors.
In every aspect of human life as well as our interaction with nature, nurture and nature are intertwined and therefore, cannot be separated. Several instances can attest to the fact that these scenarios other than being the key components in human progression are also related. For example, academic success has to some extent elicited a debate as to whether there is a genetic modification warranting success for others or whether environmental factors are the determinants of academic excellence. The commonly asked question also centers on domestic violence where some spouses are physically and emotionally abused therefore making one wonder if either one of the spouses abusing the other was born with such tendencies or if they got such characters from the people/the environment they interact with as they grew up. The truth is that apportioning blame to either factor as a contributor to a given behavior will almost be impossible but the common standpoint is that the two equally contribute to our behavior.
Other than the obvious influences that are affected by our genetic composition such as the color of our eyes, hair, and diseases like diabetes; a person’s lifestyle which is largely environmental can influence his or her lifespan. Our immune system can be compromised if we opt for food or a lifestyle that is devastating our health for example consumption of oily foodstuff which is full of cholesterol can clog our arteries hence contribute to heart diseases.
Just to conclude, despite the debate about nurture versus nature having been here for a very long time, it is seemingly not ending soon given that the current debates are skewed toward one side that different researchers think is the right argument. This continues to attract counter-arguments either dismissing their finding or affirming it. However, there is generally a consensus to the effect that nature vs nurture is just a debate but they cannot be isolated as both complements each other. However, the difference between nature and nurture can be established.
From the guide to the nature versus nurture example given, you are now fully equipped to write one of your own. If you need some more nature vs nurture examples, contact us; we have plenty of samples on offer!
While trying to grasp how to start a nature vs nurture essay, understanding of 'what is nature vs nurture' provides the foundation. It is nearly impossible to dichotomize the nurture from nature and the vice versa given their joint contribution, and for that reason, even the ancient belief that one was superior by the other is no longer making sense. There is indeed no much difference between nature and nurture